Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Jun 1998 15:34:02 +1000
From:      Sue Blake <sue@welearn.com.au>
To:        Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@hwcn.org>
Cc:        Brett Taylor <brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Concurrent package making allowed?
Message-ID:  <19980628153402.12114@welearn.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980628003544.25923A-100000@james.hwcn.org>; from Tim Vanderhoek on Sun, Jun 28, 1998 at 12:53:57AM -0400
References:  <19980628095002.19830@welearn.com.au> <Pine.GSO.3.96.980628003544.25923A-100000@james.hwcn.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 28, 1998 at 12:53:57AM -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jun 1998, Sue Blake wrote:
> 
> > One way, for example, would be to put up a personal web page listing
> > those ports which I know to work without X, but I can't see any good way
> 
> Ugh!

Yes, well, this is the best I can come up with :-)

> > Looking in every Makefile might seem a pain, but quite tolerable when
> > simply looking for a port to do a particular job without X. Consider that
> 
> You should look in the Makefile of any port before you compile it...

If you know what the stuff in a Makefile is. Beginners won't. I'm juuuust
staaaarting to learn about them, and I've been blindly typing "make
install" for months.

> However, it shouldn't be necessary to look in the Makefile to
> determine if the port requires X.
> 
> Currently you should be able to divine it from the CATEGORIES
> (yes, I know, many of the ports don't have the right CATEGORIES,
> but that's a problem due to the fast growth of the collection and
> education is the solution to it).

You mean categories like audio? graphics? We found that didn't help.
If I could use grep to exclude everything uninteresting from INDEX I'd be
happy as larry, but we haven't found a way to do that that comes close.

> Actually, I prefer the patch asami posted (with the caveat that I
> lost the patch and can't look over it right now to make sure I
> still prefer it :).

Hmm.. ok, maybe there's a good solution there but it would have gone over
my head. I'm just a user who wanted to explain why it's hard to avoid
installing the wrong stuff. I think my point has been taken and there's
nothing more I can usefully contribute. It'll be fixed one day if it can
be, and that's great. Thanks for listening.

-- 

Regards,
        -*Sue*-


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980628153402.12114>