Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:36:00 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: Daeron <daeron@fandom.net> Cc: will@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kdeaddons Message-ID: <20020108163600.C13189@straylight.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <1671.192.168.167.6.1010396419.squirrel@192.168.167.1>; from daeron@fandom.net on Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 08:40:19PM %2B1100 References: <1671.192.168.167.6.1010396419.squirrel@192.168.167.1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 08:40:19PM +1100, Daeron wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for taking care of the port, but could you please update the > Makefile to use : > CONFIGURE_ARGS+= > *instead* of > CONFIGURE_ARGS= > > The update would allow people to pass any extra parameters to the > configure routine, e.g. enabling / disabling extra features etc. > In this case you are preventing me from enabling the Xinerama support > which has been compiled into the XFree86 & KDElibs packages. > Thanx again. :) > :) As I explained in the thread started by your (much, much earlier) message with the subject of 'Request for all ports', this could break if there is some port that depends on kdeaddons. In that case, the other port's CONFIGURE_ARGS would be in the environment when the Ports collection build infrastructure tries to build kdeaddons, and there might very well be unknown or conflicting arguments left over from the other port, whic would mightily confuzzle the kdeaddons configure script. G'luck, Peter -- If this sentence didn't exist, somebody would have invented it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020108163600.C13189>