From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 22 17:55:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA24049 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 17:55:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp02.primenet.com (smtp02.primenet.com [206.165.6.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA24044 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 00:55:56 GMT (envelope-from tlambert@usr02.primenet.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp02.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA02731; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 17:55:56 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr02.primenet.com(206.165.6.202) via SMTP by smtp02.primenet.com, id smtpd002703; Wed Apr 22 17:55:52 1998 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA16205; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 17:55:52 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199804230055.RAA16205@usr02.primenet.com> Subject: Re: am-utils: contrib or port? To: Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com (Harlan Stenn) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 00:55:52 +0000 (GMT) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <12791.893229096@brown.pfcs.com> from "Harlan Stenn" at Apr 22, 98 03:11:36 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > It's been suggested that we upgrade the existing amd stuff to am-utils. > > Should this be done as a port or should it be put in contrib? I think it's a prat of the base system. I guess the question is "why isn't it on a vendor branch"? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message