From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 14 16:01:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7216E16A4BF for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 16:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cultdeadsheep.org (charon.cultdeadsheep.org [80.65.226.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738CC43F75 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 16:01:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org) Received: (qmail 47851 invoked by uid 85); 15 Sep 2003 01:01:36 +0200 Received: from sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20rc2 ( Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 0.040408 secs); 14 Sep 2003 23:01:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lucifer.cultdeadsheep.org) (sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org@192.168.0.2) by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 15 Sep 2003 01:01:36 +0200 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:55:01 +0200 From: Clement Laforet To: Clement Laforet Message-Id: <20030915005501.49fa64af.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <20030914230925.4f7a2900.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> References: <20030914224333.41ca0e65.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> <1063573439.659.25.camel@localhost> <20030914230925.4f7a2900.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> Organization: tH3 cUlt 0f tH3 d3@d sH33p X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) X-Face: ._cVVRDn#-2((lnfi^P7CoD4htI$4+#G/G)!w|,}H5yK~%(3-C.JlEYbOjJGFwJkt*7N^%z jYeu[;}]}F"3}l5R'l"X0HbvT^D\Q&%deCo)MayY`);TO Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fix for harvest on bento X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 23:01:39 -0000 On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 23:09:25 +0200 Clement Laforet wrote: Even If I don't like the idea, patch has been submitted. Thanks Joe for the pointing ! :-) regards, clem > On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 17:04:00 -0400 > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > > Why not simply add: > > > > PREFIX?= ${LOCALBASE}/${PORTNAME} > > > > to the Makefile? Or you could add: > > > > PREFIX:= ${PREFIX}/${PORTNAME} > > > > After .include . > > > > Hummmm, I thought it would break package creation... By the way, I'll > give a try... wait a couple of minutes for a new patch. > > regards, > clem > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"