tuation? https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2024-June/006047.html It has a follow-up about a fix in https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2024-June/006075.html. Regards, Ronald. ------=_Part_3565_798228293.1719909620800 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Van: Craig Leres <leres@freebsd.org>
Datum: dinsdag, 2 juli 2024 01:04
Aan: Michael Proto <mike@jellydonut.org>
CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Onderwerp: Re: FreeBSD 14.x localhost source address

On 7/1/24 15:53, Michael Proto wrote:
>   What netmask are you using for 127.0.0.2? I'd treat it as I would an
> IP alias (only on localhost) with a /32 netmask, should keep it
> isolated. Just tried it myself on a test box and iperf works as
> expected, using 127.0.0.1 as the source when connecting.

I was just looking at that and I used 127.0.0.2 without an explicit mask and the system picked /24. I'm not sure why I did it that way but it's been awhile.

I just got rid of lo2 and made 127.0.0.2/32 an alias on lo0 and it seems to work better all around.

I guess the overlap between 127.0.0.0/8 and 127.0.0.0/24 was problematic.

        Craig
 



Hi,

Could it be that this mail thread also applies to your situation?
https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2024-June/006047.html

It has a follow-up about a fix in https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2024-June/006075.html.

Regards,
Ronald.
  ------=_Part_3565_798228293.1719909620800--