Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:31:32 -0600 From: "Brandon D. Valentine" <brandon@dvalentine.com> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: www/flashpluginwrapper Message-ID: <20040219003131.GF8132@geekpunk.net> In-Reply-To: <20040218144748.GX53771@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <20040218062743.GT53771@toxic.magnesium.net> <200402181358.i1IDw5Xh050695@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <20040218144748.GX53771@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:47:48AM -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> >> (02.18.2004 @ 0858 PST): Norikatsu Shigemura said, in 1.1K: <<
> > I will not remove flashpluginwrapper. But I think that anyone
> > doesn't want to use this port. Because it was upgrade to
> > linuxpluginwrapper. Of cause, I know many people who is using
> > non-libmap.conf(5) feature's environment. So I'm keeping it.
>
> On systems on which linuxflashplugin will work out-of-the-box (i.e. 5.X,
> 4.X after a week ago), I think flashpluginwrapper should still be marked
> IGNORE, and should instruct people to use linuxflashplugin.
My suggestion would be to add a conditional to the port Makefile like
this:
.if ${OSVERSION} < 490102
IGNORE= "Please use www/linuxpluginwrapper. This port should be obsolete. If you wish to use this port anyway, set NO_IGNORE."
.endif
HTH,
Brandon D. Valentine
--
brandon@dvalentine.com http://www.geekpunk.net
Pseudo-Random Googlism: winter is camellia season
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040219003131.GF8132>