From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Aug 10 23:59:29 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id XAA08842
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 10 Aug 1995 23:59:29 -0700
Received: from relay.philips.nl (relay.philips.nl [130.144.65.1])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA08819
          ; Thu, 10 Aug 1995 23:59:24 -0700
Received: from cnps.lss.cp.philips.com ([130.144.198.1]) by relay.philips.nl (8.6.9/8.6.9-950414) with SMTP id IAA15799; Fri, 11 Aug 1995 08:58:06 +0200
Received: from spooky.lss.cp.philips.com by cnps.lss.cp.philips.com with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0sgoxN-00014hC; Fri, 11 Aug 95 08:56 MET
Received: by spooky.lss.cp.philips.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #1)
	id m0sgnzM-000HneC; Fri, 11 Aug 95 08:54 MET DST
Message-Id: <m0sgnzM-000HneC@spooky.lss.cp.philips.com>
From: guido@spooky.lss.cp.philips.com (Guido van Rooij)
Subject: Re: S/key and WU-FTPD
To: tom@uniserve.com (Tom Samplonius)
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 1995 08:54:40 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: greg@uswest.net, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, questions@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950810121735.24100H-100000@haven.uniserve.com> from "Tom Samplonius" at Aug 10, 95 12:21:31 pm
Reply-To: Guido.vanRooij@nl.cis.philips.com (Guido van Rooij)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 149       
Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Tom Samplonius wrote:
> 
> 
>   The patches for S/key were supposed to have already been applied to 2.0.5R.

Not only supposed...They *are*.

-Guido