From owner-cvs-ports  Sun May  3 19:58:17 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports>
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA27825
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Sun, 3 May 1998 19:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-ports)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA27764;
          Sun, 3 May 1998 19:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA01824;
	Sun, 3 May 1998 19:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
cc: Matthew Hunt <mph@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG,
        cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/ijb - Imported sources 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 03 May 1998 23:04:38 +0200."
             <19980503230438.48318@follo.net> 
Date: Sun, 03 May 1998 19:57:41 -0700
Message-ID: <1820.894250661@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Refusing to download ads from the WWW is very bad practice.  Those ads are
> paying for the service you're using.  I'm not even certain we should have
> the above program as a port - I don't think we'd have a 'automated

I don't think it's our position to judge for anything which isn't
clearly illegal or causes problems for the average user (e.g.
automated spamming software, though some would claim that sendmail
already matches that description :-).