From owner-freebsd-security Wed Dec 5 10:35:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (whizzo.TransSys.COM [144.202.42.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE4C37B405; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 10:35:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (#6@localhost.transsys.com [127.0.0.1]) by whizzo.transsys.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fB5IZqH95521; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 13:35:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from louie@whizzo.transsys.com) Message-Id: <200112051835.fB5IZqH95521@whizzo.transsys.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: Eugene Grosbein , "Crist J . Clark" , net@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Image-URL: http://www.transsys.com/louie/images/louie-mail.jpg From: "Louis A. Mamakos" Subject: Re: NOARP - gateway must answer and have frozen ARP table References: <20011205124430.A83642@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <20011205040316.H40864@blossom.cjclark.org> <20011205231735.A1361@grosbein.pp.ru> <20011205193859.B79705@sunbay.com> In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Dec 2001 19:38:59 +0200." <20011205193859.B79705@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 13:35:52 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Doesn't this behavior need to be on a per-interface basis? I'm wondering if a single sysctl is sufficient to get the desired effect. louie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message