From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 4 00:40:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5252B16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 00:40:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.cyclades.de (mail.cyclades.de [62.225.173.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017F943FDF for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2003 00:40:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from MH@kernel32.de) Received: from pd9e35f4f.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.95.79] helo=kernel32.de) by www.cyclades.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AGwMB-0002KP-00; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 09:16:07 +0100 Message-ID: <3FA75F7F.5020308@kernel32.de> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 09:12:47 +0100 From: Marian Hettwer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031026 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arun Sharma References: <20031104074813.GA2567@sharma-home.net> In-Reply-To: <20031104074813.GA2567@sharma-home.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd.rpm.mk ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 08:40:24 -0000 Hi there, Arun Sharma wrote: > I haven't seen much discussion in the archives about using the excellent > BSD ports system for the source environment and RPM for binary packaging. > I hacked up a very basic bsd.rpm.mk if anyone is interested. > well, why using RPM for binary packaging ?! If to replace the pkg_* featureset of BSD then please replace it with apt_* from those Debian guys. Anyhow. Just my opinion ;-) best regards, Marian