Date: Wed, 12 Jun 1996 05:18:42 -0700 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: adaptec disk controllers and 2.1-RELEASE Message-ID: <199606121218.FAA00971@Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "11 Jun 1996 20:11:45 EDT." <4pl201$rov@twwells.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>In article <199606112325.QAA02664@Root.COM>, >David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> wrote: >: >I'm using an adaptec 2940 on my news server. I've been told that >: >the occasional panics (something about scsi bus timeouts?) have >: >been resolved by a -STABLE release; however, when I installed the >: >first of them (well, partially: I swapped kernels and /bin), I >: >got a flood of complaints that my server was failing. >: >: Justin is out of town this week. You should upgrade to -stable. > >The current -stable, which is the second one? Didn't I just read >of problems with it? -stable is not a release. It refers to a branch of our CVS tree. There was a recent snapshot of -stable, but it doesn't have the latest aha2940 fixes. When I said "upgrade to -stable", I meant using SUP to update your source tree to the current -stable sources. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606121218.FAA00971>