From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 23 06:47:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@nevdull.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED43EBBD for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 06:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8FE8B4E; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 06:47:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id JAA11230; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:47:45 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1Z7Hzk-0006B0-Sl; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:47:44 +0300 Message-ID: <558900ED.8060804@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:47:09 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neel Natu CC: Peter Grehan , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: dtrace fbt vs vmm References: <5588317C.8020203@FreeBSD.org> <558832E8.9080407@freebsd.org> <55883537.3030400@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 06:47:48 -0000 On 23/06/2015 05:24, Neel Natu wrote: > Hi Andriy, > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> On 22/06/2015 19:08, Peter Grehan wrote: >>> Hi Andriy, >>> >>>> I haven't investigated this issue further, but if there are any unsafe functions >>>> in vmm it would be nice to blacklist them in the fbt code. >>>> Perhaps blacklisting everything from vmm module could be a stopgap solution. >>> >>> Intel or AMD ? We've been able to run dtrace on Intel; less (to no) coverage on >>> AMD so there's quite possibly bugs there. >> >> Peter, >> >> it's AMD again. >> Thanks! >> > > This was an issue with 'svm_launch()' FBT tracing and is fixed in r284712. > > Details are in the commit message: > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=284712 Thank you! -- Andriy Gapon