From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 29 06:32:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4358016A4CE for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 06:32:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [62.67.200.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1018F43D45 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 06:32:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dierk@blaxxtarz.de) Received: (qmail 2405 invoked from network); 29 Feb 2004 14:32:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO xplode.evangelion.free) (799978@[213.23.69.103]) (envelope-sender )AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 29 Feb 2004 14:32:55 -0000 Received: from [192.168.123.1] (helo=blaxxtarz.evangelion.free) by xplode.evangelion.free with esmtp (Exim 4.22 #1 (Unix)) id 1AxRzy-000OHY-Mf for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:32:54 +0100 Received: from blaxxtarz.evangelion.free (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i1TEX7sw090660 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:33:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dierk@blaxxtarz.evangelion.free) Received: (from dierk@localhost)i1TEX75g090659 for current@freebsd.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:33:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dierk) Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:33:07 +0100 From: Dierk Sacher To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040229143307.GA90485@blaxxtarz.evangelion.free> References: <20040229011945.GA86654@blaxxtarz.evangelion.free> <4041DF79.5040908@ewetel.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4041DF79.5040908@ewetel.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: ATAPICAM broken in 5.2.1 (did work in 5.2)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:32:58 -0000 Zitiere Uwe Laverenz vom Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 01:47:53PM +0100: > Dierk Sacher wrote: > > >There is no difference, if I disable ACPI or have a medium in the drive > >or not. If I compile a kernel without "option atapicam" the panic goes > >away. > > Maybe there's something wrong with your kernel config? The entry should > be "device atapicam", not "option atapicam". I have 2 machines running > 5.2.1 with atapicam: no problems. My fault. The entry actually is "device atapicam". If it's working for you, it must be a problem specific to my hardware. After reporting it that stupid, I better get used to burncd anyway. Dierk -- |----+----|----+----|----+----|----+----|----+----|----+----|----+----|--< GPG Fingerprint: D14C 12BB 37A6 6745 7F4F F420 9E59 D79E A492 2A96 GPG KeyID : A4922A96 +------------------------------------------------------------------------+