From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 27 09:49:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D762D106566B; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:49:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9158613C4DD; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:49:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F249741C798; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:30:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6DMjh8i2nEEf; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:30:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id A5B0441C76D; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:30:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B223444885; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:28:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Julian Elischer In-Reply-To: <47C4E87B.8010403@elischer.org> Message-ID: <20080227092653.J94494@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <47C39948.3080907@elischer.org> <47C4BB96.80804@icir.org> <47C4E87B.8010403@elischer.org> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Marko Zec , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: warning of pending commit attempt. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:49:02 -0000 On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Julian Elischer wrote: Hi, > would appear in all jails. I uses and expands on the jail infrastructure. wait a sec, does that mean that it expands jails and jails will then be called "vimages"? Or will it still be possible to have jails inside a virtual instance? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT Software is harder than hardware so better get it right the first time.