Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 19:19:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207051918500.3956@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20120705131518.06898223@bhuda.mired.org> References: <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF4BEED.10103@FreeBSD.org> <62039A45-92E4-4588-988D-6DF39D7B01E5@bsdimp.com> <201207050922.25815.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> <20120705082857.GB37083@server.rulingia.com> <4FF55864.8040807@FreeBSD.org> <4FF5BE93.4010509@my.gd> <20120705170944.GA43725@DataIX.net> <20120705131518.06898223@bhuda.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Haha sysctl... thats going quite a bit too far into the system for this. > > Yup. A sysctl (or rc.conf variable) intended specifically to control > the behavior of shells is an even worse idea than turning this nanny > behavior on for everyone. some people work hard to turn FreeBSD to "mainstream" (==useless) piece of software. Not first time, but no great "success" achieved for now.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1207051918500.3956>