Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 19:26:42 -0300 From: Mario Lobo <lobo@bsd.com.br> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The source code of *BSD contains the comment =?UTF-8?B?4oCY?= =?UTF-8?B?RG9lcw==?= this belong =?UTF-8?B?aGVyZT/igJk=?= Message-ID: <20140416192642.70a23386@Papi> In-Reply-To: <20140416190858.5ed96d5d@mdontu-l> References: <COL127-W50854C41C300BA3C07D981E8500@phx.gbl> <COL127-W3715056578EC3F958B38B8E8530@phx.gbl> <20140416150701.330b76b8@mdontu-l> <9727DB19-43CC-45B6-9EA4-3380BCAC93C5@gmail.com> <20140416190858.5ed96d5d@mdontu-l>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 19:08:58 +0300 Mihai Don=C8=9Bu <mihai.dontu@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:51:10 -0500 Matthew Pherigo wrote: > > > On Apr 16, 2014, at 7:07 AM, Mihai Don=C8=9Bu wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:41:19 +0300 Jorge Luis Carvalho Santos > > > wrote: > > >>> Lok Technologies , a San Jose, Calif.-based maker of networking > > >>> gear, started out using Linux in its equipment but switched to > > >>> OpenBSD four years ago after company founder Simon Lok, who > > >>> holds a doctorate in computer science, took a close look at the > > >>> Linux source code.=E2=80=9CYou know what I found? Right in the kern= el, > > >>> in the heart of the operating system, I found a developer=E2=80=99s > > >>> comment that said, =E2=80=98Does this belong here?=E2=80=99 =E2=80= =9CLok says. =E2=80=9CWhat > > >>> kind of confidence does that inspire? Right then I knew it was > > >>> time to switch.=E2=80=9D > > >>> reference :http://www.forbes.com/2005/06/16/linux-bsd-unix-cz_dl_06= 16theo.html > > >>> The source code of *BSD contains the comment =E2=80=98Does this > > >>> belong here?=E2=80=99 > > >>=20 > > >> I am very interested in being answered, please help me > > >=20 > > > I noticed there's a trend these days to dig out these ancient > > > articles and try and stir up the BSD people. What's up with that? > >=20 > > If by "trend", you mean "one persistent guy", then yes, it is quite > > a trend. >=20 > Mm. I didn't notice he's the one who started that Stallman thread. :-) >=20 Here is a compilation of his subjects: ------------------------------------------------------------------ *What security tool that Ubuntu Forums should have used to not be hacked? *To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable? *What are the BSD's projects that are responsibles by existence of Internet and e-mail ?=20 *Richard Stallman remains hypocritical liar? *Complete online course in assembly language of Randall Hyde's is really course in assembly language?=20 *There is user group FreeBSD discussing matters that lead nowhere? *Assembly continues to be used in the development of FreeBSD? (This one is worth showing the body of the message) - According to the book "Complete and Total C" by Herbert Schildt, the general rule is not to use Assembly because it creates too many problems. and, of course, the latest: *The source code of *BSD contains the comment =E2=80=98Does this belong h= ere?=E2=80=99 ------------------------------------------------------------------ This guy was banned from our bsd.com.br list for firing blanks like these. He dared posting some of these in hackers@! Some may argue that these are legit and pertinent. Hey, if anyone is in the mood for philosophical dives, why not? But please, feed the troll on a private pool.=20 Just my 0,02... --=20 Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) =20 "UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things,=20 because that would also stop you from doing clever things."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140416192642.70a23386>