From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 7 07:31:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0B816A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 07:31:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from s29.loopia.se (s29.loopia.se [194.9.94.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4BA6443D45 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 07:31:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@pyttemjuk.se) Received: (qmail 50367 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2004 07:39:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO i8.pyttemjuk.se) (194.9.94.253) by s29.loopia.se with SMTP; 7 Sep 2004 07:39:20 -0000 Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20040907092825.03f35ec0@imap.pyttemjuk.se> X-Sender: freebsd@pyttemjuk.se@imap.pyttemjuk.se X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 09:31:44 +0200 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Emil Isberg In-Reply-To: <20040906133239.2c42ffb7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <6.1.2.0.2.20040906171837.03ff8170@imap.pyttemjuk.se> <20040906133239.2c42ffb7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: Fwd: external todo patch to qmail (ports) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 07:31:54 -0000 At 19:32 2004-09-06, you wrote: >Emil Isberg wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I sent the following message to the qmail port maintainer. > > External todo patch is a good option to have for busy mailservers since if > > you continously get email to your smtp-server then qmail-send can't > keep up > > with both todo-queue and spawning qmail-local/qmail-remote. > > > > I don't suggest changing the default install, but only add external > todo as > > an option for those of us that use freebsd and qmail for busy mailservers. > > > > I have not yet received any response from the qmail port maintainer so I > > wonder where I should go and whom I should turn to to get it included in > > the port or a reason why it shouldn't be added. > >Have you filed a PR? >http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html No I didn't. When I was going to the text said that to be sure that I really should file a PR (since it wasn't a bug) then I should ask on freebsd-questions. :-) I'll file a PR then. Thanks.