From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 21:21:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA604106566C; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 21:21:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12A68FC14; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 21:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5ECB246B0A; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:21:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF6348A02F; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:21:43 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, lev@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:21:42 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110617; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <1505890415.20110908005042@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1036483457.20110908010247@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <1036483457.20110908010247@serebryakov.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201109071721.42950.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:21:44 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Garrett Cooper Subject: Re: -CURRENT (BETA2) nfs client surprise X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:21:45 -0000 On Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:02:47 pm Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Garrett. > You wrote 8 =F1=E5=ED=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 0:55:11: >=20 > > It needs to be changed to NFSCL: >=20 > > $ svngrep -r NFSCL /sys/i386/conf/GENERIC > > options NFSCL # New Network Filesystem Client > > options NFS_ROOT # NFS usable as /, requires NFS= CL > Yep, I found it in seconds, but after that kernel + nanobsd image > rebuild takes considerable amount of time. >=20 > > I think the nomenclature change was done s.t. clients using old NFS > > implementations didn't require any changes in their KERNCONF files. > It is not true. I'm using old KERNCONF (with only NFSCLIENT) and old > fstab (Without any NSF vversion options) -- and got error on boot due > to unmountable file system! Of course, if this system had had full set > of modules, this situation would have masked by transparent loading of > nfscl.ko. You can't rely on using kernel configs unchanged across major releases. =2D-=20 John Baldwin