Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:57:22 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: rick norman <rick.norman@lmco.com> Cc: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dummynet byte counters Message-ID: <20020117155722.A978@iguana.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <3C476444.F8297B8B@lmco.com> References: <20020117093911.C98289@iguana.icir.org> <3C472D22.A1BECD0D@lmco.com> <20020117154921.E99085@iguana.icir.org> <3C476444.F8297B8B@lmco.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 03:54:44PM -0800, rick norman wrote: > Actually I would like to see counters on in and out, though I can > easily adapt to whatever you do. the first method includes all -- in, in-transit, drops and by difference you can compute the out luigi > Rick > > Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 11:59:30AM -0800, rick norman wrote: > > > For what it's worth, I currently use a pipe with an ipfw 'in' rule to > > > monitor the bw fanning in to a pipe from several variable sources. In this > > > case I'm > > > interested in the total delivered from several external nodes. I like the > > > ability to drop a pipe into any data stream I choose in a potentially > > > complex test bed and monitor it without perturbing it significantly. > > > > > > It would seem that there might be occasions where one would want to > > > monitor the data stream both coming to the queue and leaving depending on > > > your test setup. > > > > so you call for the first method, though note that if the > > pipe does not have any bw limit then in and out are the same thing > > > > cheers > > luigi > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020117155722.A978>