From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 16 17:24:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA3216A4CE for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:24:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kayjay.xs4all.nl (kayjay.xs4all.nl [80.126.33.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1E443D46 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:24:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from karelj@kayjay.xs4all.nl) Received: from kayjay.xs4all.nl (localhost.kayjay.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by kayjay.xs4all.nl (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAGHOkYC016017; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:24:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from karelj@kayjay.xs4all.nl) Received: (from karelj@localhost) by kayjay.xs4all.nl (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iAGHOjsp016016; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:24:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from karelj) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:24:45 +0100 From: "Karel J. Bosschaart" To: Dan MacMillan Message-ID: <20041116172445.GA14385@kayjay.xs4all.nl> References: <419A7FC3.30900@optusnet.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org cc: Andrew Sinclair Subject: Re: What OS are you? fun X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:24:48 -0000 On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 07:39:13AM -0700, Dan MacMillan wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andrew Sinclair > > Sent: November 16, 2004 15:32 > > To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: What OS are you? fun > > > > By the way, speed of light in the other thread is way off. The "accepted > > constant" is bogus. The average speed is actually closer to 2.4 million > > kilometers per second. > > You'd better cite your source and / or reasoning, as ~3*10^8m/s =is= the > accepted constant speed of light in vacuum. Yes indeed. Also, the word 'average' makes the statement pretty meaningless without specifying how the averaging is done (different materials I think?). Karel.