From owner-freebsd-security Mon Apr 1 3:35:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from cairo.anu.edu.au (cairo.anu.edu.au [150.203.224.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3A637B417 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2002 03:35:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from cairo.anu.edu.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cairo.anu.edu.au (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g31BZRsd014857; Mon, 1 Apr 2002 21:35:28 +1000 (EST) Received: (from avalon@localhost) by cairo.anu.edu.au (8.12.0/8.12.0.Beta16) id g31BZQJj014853; Mon, 1 Apr 2002 21:35:26 +1000 (EST) From: Darren Reed Message-Id: <200204011135.g31BZQJj014853@cairo.anu.edu.au> Subject: Re: pf OR ipf ? To: kerberus@microbsd.net (kerberus) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 21:35:26 +1000 (Australia/NSW) Cc: avalon@cairo.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed), Alex.Wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au, FreeBSD-Security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <1017320587.4219.1.camel@vaio.microbsd.net> from "kerberus" at Mar 28, 2002 08:03:07 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I wonder just how much you have "modified" it. That aside, I think you need to learn to read. In some mail from kerberus, sie said: > > Because I can modify it to whatever I want...!!! I also like certain > aspects of the pfctl mechanism...... > > > > > Why use PF when you can use IPF ? :) > > > > Darren > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message