From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 4 12:38: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760BE37B407 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 12:38:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f94J4lg00674; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 21:04:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Kazutaka YOKOTA Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: log(9) bug? or feature? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Oct 2001 20:55:07 +0900." <200110021155.UAA10794@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 21:04:47 +0200 Message-ID: <672.1002222287@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200110021155.UAA10794@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp>, Kazutaka YOK OTA writes: >In rev 1.67 and later, the message goes to the log buffer only if a >process is reading the log buffer. If no process is reading, the >message goes to the console ONLY, and it is not put into the log >buffer. This behavior is inconsistent with the above comment. Is this >a bug introduced in rev 1.67, or is it the intended new behavior and >the comment is out of date? Actually, I think this is consistent, since console messages is now also put in the buffer, but I am not 100% sure... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message