From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 04:53:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B1A1065670; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 04:53:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@mmu.edu.my) Received: from staff.cyber.mmu.edu.my (staff.cyber.mmu.edu.my [203.106.62.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E8C8FC28; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 04:53:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@mmu.edu.my) Received: by staff.cyber.mmu.edu.my (Postfix, from userid 0) id 226574D626B; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 12:33:53 +0800 (MYT) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by mmu.edu.my (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8592755E4A8 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:58:24 +0800 (MYT) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08991A8F09; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:56:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3F21065716; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:56:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org) Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67951065676; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:56:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A898FC34; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:56:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4949846B96; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:56:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:56:40 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Vadim Goncharov In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080327135318.R73942@fledge.watson.org> References: <47E9448F.1010304@ipfw.ru> <20080326142115.K34007@fledge.watson.org> <20080327062556.GE3180@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unionfs status X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:53:21 -0000 On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Vadim Goncharov wrote: >> Thanks for this description. So we basically have two different uses for >> UNIX sockets in unionfs with jails ? > >> 1) socket in jail to communicate only inside one jail (syslog-case) 2) >> socket in jail as a means of IPC between different jails (mysql-case) > >> Is 2) really supposed to work like this ? > > This is user's/admin's point of view, that it should work this way: one > mysql with one socket for several jails. I don't know all gory details about > how code really works. As I see it, nullfs should provide a shared socket, it is intended to provide access to the same object, and unionfs should provide independent sockets, as unionfs is intended to provide isolation. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"