From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 17 10:41:13 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA05179 for current-outgoing; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 10:41:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from innocence.interface-business.de (innocence.interface-business.de [193.101.57.202]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA05153 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 10:41:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ida.interface-business.de (ida.interface-business.de [193.101.57.203]) by innocence.interface-business.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA07434 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 19:37:13 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by ida.interface-business.de (8.8.5/8.7.3) id TAA04741; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 19:45:51 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 19:45:51 +0100 From: j@ida.interface-business.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Subject: ep0 in GENERIC X-Mailer: Mutt 0.55-PL15 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Phone: +49-351-31809-14 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@interface-business.de (Joerg Wunsch) Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Just curious: Why don't we use the following config line for ep0 (3C509)? device ep0 at isa? port ? net irq ? vector epintr The autoprobing seems to work, and it's as invasive as not using autoprobing since it happens by reading the EEPROM via a fixed port address (which is done anyway as long as at least one ep device is enabled). Using the autoprobing seems to get us away even with Plug&Pray-configured cards. Unless somebody seriously objects, i would change it to the above. -- J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer joerg_wunsch@interface-business.de http://www.interface-business.de/~j