From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 26 15:29:18 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63AF16A4CE
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:29:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4797D43D39
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:29:18 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mureninc@gmail.com)
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1589142wra
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
	s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=O9kU3VDwqJly1Ey5v4rIiv8hKi0xePpO9c+EEHZcg2d6jfmK+8zxPU4RALIA2nn+Wvb/zT74QRi4XmzS7aTL1L8RMVvaebRapBsbyFo6I2UvAWBzAjgIXit8ua/8+AVxG1qsZmmxTR1gsypxSOB/DA1aUgWs10EKSct1r1uoGE4=
Received: by 10.54.100.20 with SMTP id x20mr2677471wrb;
        Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.83.8 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f34ca13c05042608296d4a8353@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:29:17 -0400
From: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@gmail.com>
To: Avleen Vig <lists-freebsd@silverwraith.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050426020924.GX29262@silverwraith.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050412213328.GC1953@lava.net>
	 <6.2.1.2.2.20050417185631.05349ee0@localhost>
	 <200504180330.37184.danny@ricin.com>
	 <20050426020924.GX29262@silverwraith.com>
cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
cc: Danny Pansters <danny@ricin.com>
Subject: Re: Will 5.4 be an "Extended Life" release?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@gmail.com>
List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting]
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:29:18 -0000

On 25/04/05, Avleen Vig <lists-freebsd@silverwraith.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 03:30:37AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:
> > Let me just boldly insert that IMHO, if 6.X is going to become stable t=
his
> > autumn already that indeed 5.4 or maybe 5.5 at least one of those must =
be
> > long-term-supported. I'm sure one of the two will, as one of the two wi=
ll
> > reflcet ultimately the walk-of-life of 5-STABLE, won't it?
>=20
> Why don't we just skip 6 and name it "FreeBSD X" or "FreeBSD 10" ?

'cause we ain't Apple. :-)=20

Any suggestions to name it XP? :-)

Constantine.