From owner-freebsd-mobile Wed Jan 28 23:08:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA14266 for freebsd-mobile-outgoing; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 23:08:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from word.smith.net.au (vh1.gsoft.com.au [203.38.152.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA14257; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 23:08:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au) Received: from word (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA01931; Thu, 29 Jan 1998 17:31:13 +1030 (CST) Message-Id: <199801290701.RAA01931@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: "Sean J. Schluntz" cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Do you need PAO on FreeBSD v2.2.5? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 28 Jan 1998 14:33:44 -0800." <34CFB248.19DB454@clicknet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 17:31:13 +1030 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" > I had been told that you didn't need to use PAO under FreeBSD v2.2.5 > that the 'stock' pccard support was working fine. Is this correct? Yes. > I've been having problems getting a 3Com 3C589D NIC running and I'm > wondering if I would have more luck with PAO. No. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\