From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jul 12 15:26:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCB9B934A9 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:26:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94CF01469 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:26:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id u186so90174276ita.0 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:26:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+z0Qsc2QC48VpVyr1pQXc0QYXQnFWf+fFDKe3UtCXHc=; b=KnR2Aqxr8FmNbk9b9KghGk5fmuUxwbPfBe1XCNGhHzsOhPsTPuRgyDH8ADg8A1aHP7 Rx4S5Ly1LHCmLGgVyHD7sDUyQdaKnKoayajAJ70vHVFObPIDDjUSWwJqFNzqNTnGJvEW XXKGWW09xsrYGSRiCUXouORc+8o33lzKYmJ54RDH1PGBSJGRSoeLOB2miaOVMZArMKFu wdP1Dzv8cVLMceVLnFNl0pRi9UE4cgkcKFSy9cImNp11BLTt7RJ3modAzPd4ErQL6TEk KcmGwfnJ8ln+1DnjECe829grmxW7+ONHRPN9ukApXCZ7VH2rXl5WzTDo0DMD1jv80NTu 2lBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+z0Qsc2QC48VpVyr1pQXc0QYXQnFWf+fFDKe3UtCXHc=; b=lMwcaNOAzkMfIgkqzXgiJZAHsRWXbCXTYGErprDo9c7/FupY/NSV8OgcmxF67IyGd1 Lv5Uvv32E7pRKdIiNFSjwykmOrWFXjuvt9rjOjRW/AEctPhIhsACYkGl8ZvysHuSu/k4 lZ9fCQGS4FOTBBIiglYWgMFt7EosC1iWvQbYjvQuohA32P/jHAesn+9i2G1m8kXQCmeN 6oyEaV3PF/+7FxeK8NNoL0R6sCyEKSTY5K7F4zfdcxRf1AnHN64572EMurg6Kkvr+oqd mbznfQX14j97oS7HFr+iwIWLefY5K5x5GfI5Gc2Ih4/YjG9zqrGLza3ww++6AuoBhY5t pOxw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tK1C5I3+4/W1Y0y1jWBzDtOM2UYPdAfQlCf0cPJeDQoTe+hHSQYpgkthPQj6UuVUZEYZX1QLkXnXOyxFA== X-Received: by 10.36.21.65 with SMTP id 62mr3731069itq.20.1468337215382; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:26:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.200.71 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:26:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160712155053.6b5a0d99@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20160712122732.GA5596@FreeBSD.org> <483d186c-ca63-60ef-5703-8a7ae37e9ced@freebsd.org> <20160712155053.6b5a0d99@gumby.homeunix.com> From: Ryan Stone Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:26:54 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Oversight in /etc/defaults/rc.conf To: RW Cc: FreeBSD Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:26:57 -0000 On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:50 AM, RW wrote: > Unless I'm misunderstanding the situation. rc.d/iovctl isn't actually > doing anything by default because of iovctl_files="". > > There is an analogy with rc.d/sysctl which runs by default, with a > an empty sysctl.conf file. This also has no explicit enable entry in > rc.conf. > That is how it is intended to work, and rc.d/sysctl was the inspiration for that script if memory serves. I'm not entirely opposed to an iovctl_enable variable but it seems redundant.