From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 08:44:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3715316A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:44:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail6.speakeasy.net (mail6.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A0A43D30 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:44:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 22721 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2003 16:44:02 -0000 Received: from dsl027-160-063.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) encrypted SMTP for ; 10 Dec 2003 16:44:02 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBAGhxnd005504; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:43:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3FD69069.5080505@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:44:00 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Peter Grehan , rwatson@FreeBSD.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HFS+ on FreeBSD (was Re: 5.1-RELEASE-p11 - ACPI panic during shutdown, USB panic w/ USB2 HD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:44:09 -0000 On 10-Dec-2003 Peter Grehan wrote: >> Shouldn't the HFS+ support get committed? It seems it would be very >> useful to FreeBDS/PowerPC users. > > Does anyone know if APSL-licensed code can go into the tree ? > Or does it go into a side dir ala sys/gnu ? Core just had a discussion on this. rwatson@ is the person to ask for sure, but I believe the result is to treat APSL code like GNU code, meaning likely, yes, it will need a sys/apsl/ tree that it lives under or some such. I would talk to rwatson@ to make sure. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/