From owner-freebsd-small  Mon Jan 24  7:34:31 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org
Received: from gidgate.gid.co.uk (gid.co.uk [194.32.164.225])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95C915570
	for <small@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 07:34:20 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk)
Received: (from rb@localhost)
	by gidgate.gid.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.7) id PAA03148;
	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 15:32:51 GMT
	(envelope-from rb)
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20000124152057.00990910@192.168.255.1>
X-Sender: rbmail@gid.co.uk
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 15:22:16 +0000
To: Vaevictus Asmadi <vae@nathanm.office.socket.net>
From: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>
Subject: Re: New approach to picobsd
Cc: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Albert Yang <albert@achtung.com>,
	small@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0001240834440.25894-100000@nathanm.office.so
 cket.net>
References: <l0313030bb4b084f9b373@[194.32.164.2]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi,

At 08:38 24/01/00 -0600, Vaevictus Asmadi wrote:

>unless it would be feasible for an unattended
>/dev/fd0 /dev/fd1 two disk/two fdd situation....

Does the loader support multiple fdds?

>On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Bob Bishop wrote:
>
> > At 14:55 +0800 22/1/00, Greg Lehey wrote:
> > >[...]
> > >In summary: what else do we need in PicoBSD?  Do we need to do it in
> > >one disk?
> >
> > A one-disk PicoBSD is absolutely required for use in unattended situations.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message