Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 14:53:35 +0200 From: Nimrod Mesika <nimrodme@bezeqint.net> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linux-base 6.2 vs linux-base 7 Message-ID: <20011123145335.A2542@localhost.bsd.net.il> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111231942230.876-100000@prophet.alphaque.com>; from dinesh@alphaque.com on Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 07:44:28PM %2B0800 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111231942230.876-100000@prophet.alphaque.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 07:44:28PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote: > > hey, > > have linux-base 6.2 installed and working fine for a bunch of linux > binaries including staroffice 5.2 and netscape-linux, both from the ports > collection. planning on trying out staroffice 6.0-beta, but it depends on > linux_base-7. > > my question is if i used portsupgrade to replace linux base 6.2 with 7, > will anything else break ? would love to hear user experiences on this > one. I tried moving to Linux_base-7 to be able to run a precompiled binary of galeon. Not only did galeon not run, but I haven't been able to make any version of linux netscape work with Linux base 7. Settled for a natively compiled Mozilla binary instead. -- Nimrod. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011123145335.A2542>