From owner-freebsd-current Tue Sep 24 7:29:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9769437B401 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 07:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h132-197-179-27.gte.com (h132-197-179-27.gte.com [132.197.179.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDC043E3B for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 07:29:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ak03@gte.com) Received: from kanpc.gte.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by h132-197-179-27.gte.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g8OETGhS067593; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:29:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ak03@kanpc.gte.com) Received: (from ak03@localhost) by kanpc.gte.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g8OETGMS067592; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:29:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:29:16 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev To: kalts@estpak.ee Cc: morganw@palmettoss.com, kris@obsecurity.org, daver@gomerbud.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: trouble building XFree86-4-Server under yesterday's current Message-Id: <20020924102916.3dfb0648.ak03@gte.com> In-Reply-To: <20020924142236.GB2348@tiiu.internal> References: <20020924063058.GA1075@tiiu.internal> <20020924094610.B17902-100000@zeolite.palmettoss.com> <20020924142236.GB2348@tiiu.internal> Organization: Verizon Data Services X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.3claws12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 17:22:36 +0300 Vallo Kallaste wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 09:47:44AM -0400, Wesley Morgan > wrote: > > > I have built XFree86 at least 3 times in the past week, all with > > varying levels of optimization, from -O to -O3 and ALWAYS with > > -march=pentium3. All of the builds succeeded, although I had > > stability problems with -O2 and above. Are you _certain_ this is a > > compiler bug? > > To put myself to the safe side, no. I'll do yet another run of > compilation on all of the CPUTYPE=p[234] levels and report how it > did tomorrow. No need. The bug is there and it is triggered by -march={athlon|p[234]}. -- Alexander Kabaev To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message