From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 13 16:45:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB62516A4CE; Fri, 13 May 2005 16:45:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.server.rpi.edu (smtp2.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786B243D77; Fri, 13 May 2005 16:45:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp2.server.rpi.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j4DGjU1Q015343; Fri, 13 May 2005 12:45:31 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <4284D4BC.9070705@FreeBSD.org> References: <200410020349.i923nG8v021675@northstar.hetzel.org> <20041002052856.GE17792@nexus.dglawrence.com> <20041002233542.GL714@nexus.dglawrence.com> <421DAD8F.6000704@portaone.com> <4284D038.50805@FreeBSD.org> <4284D4BC.9070705@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 12:45:29 -0400 To: Maxim Sobolev From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-RPI-SA-Score: undef - spam-scanning disabled X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) on 128.113.2.2 cc: Paul Saab cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Bug in #! processing - One More Time X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 16:45:33 -0000 At 7:24 PM +0300 5/13/05, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >Garance A Drosihn wrote: >>At 7:05 PM +0300 5/13/05, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> >>>Attached please find patch which rips any special processing of >>>command line arguments. It should put FreeBSD into the very same >>>ship with the rest of unices and linuces out there. >> >>Actually, thanks to a message from Paul Saab last weekend, I've >>been working on this change for much of the past week. > >Well, let's agree that if I don't hear from you for another 2 days >I'll commit my change, OK? I should have done enough testing by Sunday evening to say something, one way or another. Sure. Note that I'm not just "running this through buildworld". That's how all the previous changes were tested, too. I have a whole battery of tests that I've been slogging through. And most the time I've been doing that, I've been muttering to myself "How did I talk myself into this?"... -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu