From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Oct 26 19:47:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A8D37B401; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 19:47:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) id f9R2lYT42760; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 19:47:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 19:47:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200110270247.f9R2lYT42760@apollo.backplane.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: John Baldwin , Mike Smith , Bakul Shah , Poul-Henning Kamp , Peter Wemm , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. References: Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :John Baldwin writes: :> My bad. C90 requires that time_t fit into a long according to :> Garrett. : :Maybe it does. Maybe it doesn't. Chapter and verse, please. : :All I have is the final draft of C99, and all it says about the width :of time_t is that it is an arithmetic type "capable of representing :times" (7.23.1). There is no mention at all of the word "long" in :section 7.23. : :DES :-- :Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org .... so, anybody have the final word on this? Anybody have the official ('can't get on the web for free because the ISO people are putzes') standard? -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message