From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 3 6:35:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185FC37B400 for ; Fri, 3 May 2002 06:35:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g43DYiQ4016394; Fri, 3 May 2002 15:34:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Josef Karthauser Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of USB subsystem. In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 03 May 2002 14:22:48 BST." <20020503132248.GA9101@genius.tao.org.uk> Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 15:34:44 +0200 Message-ID: <16393.1020432884@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20020503132248.GA9101@genius.tao.org.uk>, Josef Karthauser writes: >I'm prepared to back everything out if required, but my feeling is >that we're a stone's throw away from solving these problems; it's >just I'm throwing stones slower than a seasoned kernel hacker would. Don't even think about it! I am very impressed that you have managed to make your way through the diff between FreeBSD and NetBSD, and I would expect that everybody with USB devices recognize the advantage of having a new USB-stuckee in FreeBSD totally balances out any inconvenience the current problems might cause. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message