From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Feb 24 9:50: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mout1.freenet.de (mout1.freenet.de [194.97.50.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF4037B401 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 09:49:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from netchild@leidinger.net) Received: from [194.97.50.136] (helo=mx3.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14WipQ-0006Hk-00; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 18:49:56 +0100 Received: from b85f3.pppool.de ([213.7.133.243] helo=Magelan.Leidinger.net) by mx3.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14WipQ-0004Hw-00; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 18:49:56 +0100 Received: from Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Magelan.Leidinger.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f1OGvhj03081; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:57:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from netchild@Leidinger.net) Message-Id: <200102241657.f1OGvhj03081@Magelan.Leidinger.net> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 17:57:42 +0100 (CET) From: Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk sys.mk To: bde@zeta.org.au Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 24 Feb, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:53:52PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> > > Hmm, that's not what's documented in the gcc info docs. >> > >> > The docs are wrong. >> > >> > > `-march=CPU TYPE' >> > > Generate instructions for the machine type CPU TYPE. The choices >> > > for CPU TYPE are the same as for `-mcpu'. Moreover, specifying >> > > `-march=CPU TYPE' implies `-mcpu=CPU TYPE'. >> > >> > That's not true, test it on your own (see my previous mail with my test >> > program) if you think the doc is right (or have a look at "man gcc" on a >> > system with gcc 2.95.3 (e.g. a recent -current)). > > No, the docs are correct here. But why are there different md5 sums in Message-ID: <200102221150.f1MBopF07996@Magelan.Leidinger.net>? > Don't look at "man gcc". It is not maintained except by non-FSF > volunteers (see the WARNING section on the first page of it). In > practice, this means that it hasn't changed significantly since > rev.1.1.1.1 in 1994. I know about the differences in "man gcc" and "info gcc", but the documentation for x86 part of -march and -mcpu are significant similar. Bye, Alexander. -- Yes, I've heard of "decaf." What's your point? http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message