Date: Sat, 16 Sep 1995 22:45:08 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: jdl@chromatic.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Release numbering Message-ID: <18559.811316708@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 17 Sep 1995 00:28:23 CDT." <199509170528.AAA14969@chrome.onramp.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> relief, take a break, and then be real gung-ho about 2.2. Why not > just let everyone work on 2.2 until it too gets to a reasonably > stable point and then call it "stable" at the same time introduce 2.3 > as the next development release. Just pipeline it, not leapfrog it? I can see that working, modulo a -STABLE or -DEVEL tag appended so people know which number is which. If we're not going to go for an even/odd scheme then something else needs to be evolved to keep them straight. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18559.811316708>