Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:24:17 +0200 From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: office@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libreoffice-3.5.2_1 tinderbox failure Message-ID: <4F969B71.1030506@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <20120424071013.GG18221@azathoth.lan> References: <4F964605.4000002@bsdforen.de> <20120424071013.GG18221@azathoth.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24/04/2012 09:10, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:19:49AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote: >> There are a couple of issues that prevent tinderbox from creating >> tinderbox packages. >> >> ... >> >> On RELENG_8 and RELENG_7 (typo fixed) tinderbox doesn't see the dependency on >> lang/clang. Thus the port installs it and tinderbox complains about >> an mtree error. >> >> I'm currently testing fixes for both. >> > > Thank is really strange to me, both passes my tinderboxes, I renamed /usr/bin/clang in the host system and lo and behold the dependencies are picked up properly, so this is in deed a problem in TB and _not_ in the libreoffice port. Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F969B71.1030506>