Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:24:17 +0200
From:      Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
To:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        office@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: libreoffice-3.5.2_1 tinderbox failure
Message-ID:  <4F969B71.1030506@bsdforen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20120424071013.GG18221@azathoth.lan>
References:  <4F964605.4000002@bsdforen.de> <20120424071013.GG18221@azathoth.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24/04/2012 09:10, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:19:49AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> There are a couple of issues that prevent tinderbox from creating
>> tinderbox packages.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> On RELENG_8 and RELENG_7 (typo fixed) tinderbox doesn't see the dependency on
>> lang/clang. Thus the port installs it and tinderbox complains about
>> an mtree error.
>>
>> I'm currently testing fixes for both.
>>
>
> Thank is really strange to me, both passes my tinderboxes,

I renamed /usr/bin/clang in the host system and lo and behold the
dependencies are picked up properly, so this is in deed a problem
in TB and _not_ in the libreoffice port.

Regards

-- 
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F969B71.1030506>