From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Jul 27 12:51:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de (dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de [139.174.243.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE3115384 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 12:51:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from olli@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA06932 for freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 21:50:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 21:50:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Oliver Fromme Message-Id: <199907271950.VAA06932@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de> To: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP kernel on dual board with single proc? Organization: Administration Heim 3 Reply-To: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 RZTUC(3) PL2] Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Mike Smith wrote in list.freebsd-smp: > > Once I booted an SMP kernel (with NCPU=2) on an SMP board with > > only one processor installed. It worked fine. Obviously, it > > automatically reverts to single-processor if only one is > > detected, instead of trying to schedule processes on the slot1 > > terminator. ;-) > > Until extremely recently, this would not have worked. If you recall > doing this more than a few weeks ago, your recollection is faulty. No, not that long ago. olli@dao-lin-hay:~> uname -a FreeBSD dao-lin-hay.heim3.tu-clausthal.de 4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #1: Mon Jul 19 06:52:57 CEST 1999 olli@dao-lin-hay.heim3.tu-clausthal.de:/usr/src/sys/compile/DAOLINHAY i386 Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, Leibnizstr. 18/61, 38678 Clausthal, Germany (Info: finger userinfo:olli@dorifer.heim3.tu-clausthal.de) "In jedem Stück Kohle wartet ein Diamant auf seine Geburt" (Terry Pratchett) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message