From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 12 13:58:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dei.calldei.com (dei.calldei.com [205.179.37.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6643614F8C for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 13:58:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@dei.calldei.com) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by dei.calldei.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA12052; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:01:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:00:58 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Costello To: Ollivier Robert Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposed patch to /etc/rc In-Reply-To: <19990312222717.A17750@keltia.freenix.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Dag-Erling Smorgrav: > > Does anybody have any objections to the attached patch? It fixes pty > > ownership at boot time so last doesn't show users as "still logged in" > > after a reboot. > > > +chown root.tty /dev/tty/[pqrsPQRS]* > > Please use the "root:tty" form (POSIX). Are there any advantages of user:group as opposed to user.group? I doubt /etc/rc is going to be portable to, say, Solaris anytime soon. (I'd look through the source if it wasn't for the miniscule problem of my disk being entirely unreadable except /usr2 and that I'm using an old 2.2 CD to boot until I get a new hard disk) > Apart from that, no objection. Who screamed "devfs! devfs!" in the back ? > -- > Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr > FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #70: Sat Feb 27 09:43:08 CET 1999 > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message