From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 7 20:51:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1B116A4CE for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:51:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018C743D58 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:51:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@cell.sick.ru) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i57KpPvw023787 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Jun 2004 00:51:25 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@cell.sick.ru) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id i57KpO8Q023786; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 00:51:25 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 00:51:24 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Maxim Konovalov Message-ID: <20040607205124.GB23669@cell.sick.ru> References: <20040530100739.GA58477@cell.sick.ru> <20040607224538.L2382@mp3files.int.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040607224538.L2382@mp3files.int.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: incorrect connect() behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 20:51:28 -0000 On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 11:02:40PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: M> Any comments? I'm agree. I prefer POSIX behavior, too. It should not break any cross-OS contributed software, or software from ports, because it expects ENETUNREACH (e.g. ntpd does not breaks). It may break only BSD specific applications, and if it does we have to fix them. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE