From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 12 17:04:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F9A106566B for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:04:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from thyme.infocus-llc.com (server.infocus-llc.com [206.156.254.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A66C8FC14 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:04:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-240-232.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.240.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thyme.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DF1B37B59F; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:46:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 352EE61C41; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:46:38 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:46:38 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20090912164638.GI31424@over-yonder.net> References: <4AAB8B38.3030705@gmail.com> <4AAB9AA3.90909@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AAB9AA3.90909@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20-fullermd.4 (2009-06-14) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.2 at thyme.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Kjell Tore Ullavik Subject: Re: port does not fetch with fetch -A, redirect X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:04:39 -0000 On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 01:57:07PM +0100 I heard the voice of Matthew Seaman, and lo! it spake thus: > > Despite the problems you report, it seems to work fine from here. It doesn't work fine when you use fetch -A, which ports does for the fetch target. I had to do the same thing (manually dereference to the launchpadlibrarian.net URL) for the bazaar-ng and bzrtools ports. It's a ugly PITA. I wish ports just followed the redirects; we have SIZE and 2 checksums to tell us if it points to something we don't want. But who wants to start THAT flamefest? -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.