Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 18:23:32 -0500 From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/biology/avida Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/biology/avida/files patch-aa patch-ac patch-ad patch-ae Message-ID: <opr7s4lizk8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20040510231607.GA64644@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200405101926.i4AJQgDB072777@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040510215441.GA58003@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040510223735.GC8419@graf.pompo.net> <20040510231607.GA64644@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 10 May 2004 16:16:07 -0700, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 12:37:35AM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: >> Le Lun 10 mai 04 ? 23:54:41 +0200, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> >> ?crivait?: >> > On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 12:26:42PM -0700, Thierry Thomas wrote: >> > >> > > Upgrade to 2.0b7 and unbreak. >> > >> > > | +PORTVERSION= 2.0b7 >> > >> > This looks like a poor choice of PORTVERSION: >> > >> > kkenn@rot26:~ pkg_version -t 2.0b7 2.0 >> > > >> >> Do you suggest to use 2.0 and concatenate b7 to DISTNAME? > > No, beta releases should use 2.0.b7 > > rot26# pkg_version -t 2.0.b7 2.0 > < > > However, it's too late to fix now, so you'll have to fix it up when > 2.0 is released (e.g. call it 2.0r1) Use PORTEPOCH instead call it 2.0r1? Cheers, Mezz > Kris -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opr7s4lizk8ckrg5>