From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 20 17:51:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8FD016A421 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:51:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from daintree.corp.yahoo.com (daintree.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.52.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0D143D46 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:51:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: by daintree.corp.yahoo.com (Postfix, from userid 2154) id AC81419761; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:51:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Wemm To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:51:39 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200509201118.08737.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20050920024215.GA22503@xor.obsecurity.org> <200509201224.21189.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200509201224.21189.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509201051.40164.peter@wemm.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Threading/KSE problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:51:41 -0000 On Monday 19 September 2005 07:54 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Tuesday 20 September 2005 12:12, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > Hm... > > > I just reinstalled Qt using the env LD_LIBMAP thing and now it > > > appears to work OK.. > > > > You probably had the old version installed from before the big > > library bump last month. > > Yes.. still it's a PITA to fix and I wonder why it breaks.. > > Anyway, hopefully if someone has the same problem they'll find this > work around :) Its why we're not supposed to bump library versions unless it is absolutely vitally necessary. The problem in this case seems to be that you've got two different instances of libpthread.so.X in your application space at once, and that's always going to screw you. I think we haven't heard the last of the pain that this ill-advised bump is going to cause. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5