Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:48:15 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 199582] ports-mgmt/portmaster ADOPT (take MAINTAINER)
Message-ID:  <bug-199582-13-bqMSw7TJgo@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-199582-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-199582-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199582

--- Comment #3 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
This is my point -- it's not about managing, it's about creating.  It has to
stay in sync with the tree.

The last time we had a lot of interaction, I was pushing hard for you to
provide poudriere test logs and IIRC, you never go poudriere running.  Well,
portmaster is essentially another implementation of a big chunk of poudriere. 

So my concern is: if you were having trouble _using_ poudriere, how can we be
confident that you can reimplement it?


Most of those PRs require signficant fixes.  This is not a "management" task,
it's active development.  This is why it was dropped -- too much requirement to
maintain, no discernible benefit (I am not included "i like it better than raw
pkg or poudriere" as a real benefit obviously)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-199582-13-bqMSw7TJgo>