Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:25:32 +0300
From:      Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, miwi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: www/mod_dosevasive20 vs. www/mod_evasive20
Message-ID:  <20080118132532.GL22695@dracon.ht-systems.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20080115000449.GA94650@eos.sc1.parodius.com>
References:  <20080115000449.GA94650@eos.sc1.parodius.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 04:04:49PM -0800 Jeremy Chadwick mentioned:
> One of our customers pointed out to me that there's two versions of the
> mod_evasive module actively floating around in ports:
> 
>   ports/www/mod_evasive20
>   ports/www/mod_dosevasive20
> 
> Based on PR 106870 and the CVS commit logs, it looks like a repocopy
> was done from mod_dosevasive20 --> mod_evasive20 (since the software
> itself was renamed identically):
> 
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=106870
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/www/mod_dosevasive20/Makefile
> 
> However, mod_dosevasive20 was never removed/deprecated.  This lead to
> some confusion...  Can anything be done about this for consistency
> reasons?
> 

I beleive the mod_dosevasive20 port should be dropped due to rename.
Have you tired contacting the maintainer?

-- 
Stanislav Sedov
ST4096-RIPE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080118132532.GL22695>