From owner-freebsd-audit  Fri Apr 28 17:47:28 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org
Received: from alcanet.com.au (mail.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 49F0337B91F; Fri, 28 Apr 2000 17:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au)
Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <115206>; Sat, 29 Apr 2000 10:47:51 +1000
From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>
Subject: Re: libmytinfo
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004252316210.13185-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>;
 from kris@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 04:25:29PM +1000
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: audit@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-Id: <00Apr29.104751est.115206@border.alcanet.com.au>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004252316210.13185-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 10:47:49 +1000
Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 04:25:29PM +1000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>We need to do a thorough audit of libncurses, libmytinfo, libtermcap, and
>libcurses in 3.X, as well as 4.0. 3.X and 4.X have different versions of
>ncurses (the 3.X version is positively ancient),

Unless there were API changes, why not just audit the newer version
and just MFC it back to 3.x?  Auditing the old code is probably going
to be more time consuming than working around the differences.

Peter


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message