From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 25 13:10:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA18887 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:10:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA18848 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:10:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA20989; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:08:12 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199802252108.NAA20989@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Dan Janowski cc: Mike Smith , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "Best" Fast Ethernet Card In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 25 Feb 1998 16:04:49 EST." <34F48770.D5A3571B@3skel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:08:10 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Mike Smith wrote: > > > > Mike Smith wrote: > > > > > > > > If someone cares to nominate a benchmark procedure for this sort of > > > > thing, I can schedule some time to run it. > > > > > > Yikes. UDP Transmit to nowhere? Will that work for > > > transmit speed? > > > > The question is how to measure CPU overhead, since that is the issue at > > hand. > > X number of bytes, seconds of system/user process time for the program? > Or is the stuff we are looking for happening in the kernel in a way that > these stats don't report? Correct. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message