From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 22:32:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9601065675 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 22:32:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kuo-lang.tseng@intel.com) Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C23F8FC14 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 22:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kuo-lang.tseng@intel.com) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2009 14:52:41 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,307,1241420400"; d="scan'208";a="418986732" Received: from orsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.226.211]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2009 15:11:13 -0700 Received: from orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.226.208]) by orsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.226.211]) with mapi; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:03:47 -0700 From: "Tseng, Kuo-Lang" To: "freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org" Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:03:45 -0700 Thread-Topic: Declaration of intrcnt and eintrcnt in amd64/amd64/support.S Thread-Index: AcnlYFR67yN1K0MoTu+Y/ksQ8alARg== Message-ID: <63FEFD5869C1DB49B69DCC57DF8F2157CA08AD20@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:48:23 +0000 Subject: Declaration of intrcnt and eintrcnt in amd64/amd64/support.S X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:32:16 -0000 Hi,=20 Currently these two variables are stored in the .text section because they = are declared without a .data directive. Is there any reason why they are no= t declared with .data directive? Or this is missing?=20 Thanks Kuo