From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 17 22:22:52 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCCB82E; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:22:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-annu.net.uoguelph.ca (esa-annu.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130828FC15; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:22:51 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqAEAMmaz1CDaFvO/2dsb2JhbABFhju4AnOCHgEBAQQBAQEgKyALBRYOCgICDQUUAikBCRgBDQYIBwQBHASHcgynRZJrgSKLVnsNgg2BEwOIYYp7gi6BHI8sgxGBTzU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,305,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="5258745" Received: from erie.cs.uoguelph.ca (HELO zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca) ([131.104.91.206]) by esa-annu.net.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2012 17:22:50 -0500 Received: from zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDEF4B4023; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:22:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:22:50 -0500 (EST) From: Rick Macklem To: Zaphod Beeblebrox Message-ID: <1469458445.1458725.1355782970762.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: iSCSI vs. SMB with ZFS. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.17.91.202] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.10_GA_2692 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/6.0.10_GA_2692) Cc: Wojciech Puchar , Ivan Voras , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:22:52 -0000 Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > Does windows 7 support nfs v4, then? Is it expected (ie: is it > worthwhile > trying) that nfsv4 would perform at a similar speed to iSCSI? It would > seem that this at least requires active directory (or this user name > mapping ... which I remember being hard). As far as I know, there is no NFSv4 in Windows. I only made the comment (which I admit was a bit off topic), because the previous post had stated "SMB or NFS, they're the same" or something like that.) There was work on an NFSv4 client for Windows being done by CITI at the Univ. of Michigan funded by Microsoft research, but I have no idea if it was ever released. rick > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"